Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] One more thing re: Santa Fe
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Mon Apr 30 18:19:34 2007
References: <008401c78b7b$eeaf4290$bb350b44@GATEWAY> <D4647FA8AC3C02AB23A6F39F@Rutabook.local>
 
I'm sure that was a relief to the citizens, then!

F1/1000000000th and be there.

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Brian Reid
Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2007 10:51
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] One more thing re: Santa Fe


> used at Los Alamos). The maximum aperture? f/0.90! For those
> low-light, hard to photograph atomic explosions.

I lived in Los Alamos when I was a kid. The explosions were at White Sands, 
near Alamogordo, not in town.



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] One more thing re: Santa Fe)
 In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] One more thing re: Santa Fe)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] One more thing re: Santa Fe)