Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 8:57 AM -0500 4/25/07, Harrison McClary wrote:
>Ok...I am thinking about buying this lens. Do those of you who have
>it like it? From what I have read it is a very nice little lens,
>and I admit the radical POV of a 12 intrigues me. I have a 16 for
>my EOS so I am not too interested in the VC 15, if I am going to go
>wide, I want even wider than what I already have.
>
>Thanks for any input as to the quality/fun of this lens. If you
>have some sample photos I'd love to see them also.
>
>--
>Harrison McClary
Hi Harrison,
I've had the 12 since it came out, and I also use the 12-24 Sigma on
the 5D. Optically, the 12 is better except of course with respect to
vignetting, but they are both fully useable. I've used the CV lens
with a center filter at times
(http://archiphoto.com/Various/RD1vignette/source/12.htm), but
usually it gets used without. I don't have any pictures posted with
the CV, but I do have a couple taken with the Sigma:
http://archiphoto.com/Various/China/source/img_3145.htm
http://archiphoto.com/Various/China/source/img_3550.htm
Besides the usual architectural stuff I've also used the 12 CV for
shooting wildlife. Birds in particular. Who needs those 560's? :-)
In 2000 I was in the Galapagos, shortly after I got the lens. One
local species, the red-footed booby perches mostly in bushes, and I
mean 'in'. If you shoot from the outside you sometimes only get
branches. So I took the camera with 12mm lens, set it on 18" or less,
stuck the whole thing into the bush and took 'environmental
portraits'. The birds might have been a bit put off by someone poking
their hand into their bush, but they didn't move. I'll have to see if
I can scan one of those shots. I don't remember how well they turned
out, though.
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com