Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Chicago. Oh no. Not again.
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun Apr 22 07:59:31 2007
References: <3a5270110704211841l115dd9eaybebd5de5e6971be2@mail.gmail.com>

You have a good eye, and I see progression in your weeks, but I'd  
edit every week down to max. 5 shots.
Thanks for showing,
Philippe


Op 22-apr-07, om 03:41 heeft cschweda het volgende geschreven:

> Briefly:
>
> Yes, this territory has been covered. And covered. And covered. (But
> wait -- not by me!)
>
> Yes, I emulate everybody under the sun and lack coherent vision. (I
> have little sense yet of what visions cohere, so this makes sense.
> Sort of.)
>
> But is this -- are these? You know ...
>
> "See,  I'm not sure I get the sense that we're seeing *you*."
>
> Well, yes. This is me. Really. An "externalized observer" in  
> Chicago, Illinois.
>
> Hmmmmm ... I dunno.
>
> Week 17 (Huh?!)
>
> http://www.metaincognita.com/assets/2007/W17/
>
> And Week 18 (in progress!): (WTF?!!)
>
> http://www.metaincognita.com/assets/2007/W18/
>
> And no ... I know, I know -- no, I have not given up my day job.
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from cschweda at gmail.com (cschweda) ([Leica] Chicago. Oh no. Not again.)