Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Then if she is a photographer, shouldn't she be removed in order to preserve accuracy of the scene -- what was going on in the absence of photographers? Maybe it is more journalistically accurate if she is removed. You alter the outcome of the experiment by the act of observing it. Something to do with a cat in a box -- you can't see what the cat's doing inside because it moves when you look inside. If being there to photograph a scene alters it then how can any photo not alter the journalistic content? This is giving me a headache. Send it to the forum!!!!!!! Tom On Apr 20, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > At 04:29 PM 4/20/2007, you wrote: >> So the legs belong to the gambling guy? >> Well he should be praying not gambling. > > Actually, they belong to a female photographer who was looking for > a different angle. > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA > http://www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information