Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctilux M8 question
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Thu Apr 19 17:49:37 2007
References: <20070419235412.BAEA3115C01@ws1-7.us4.outblaze.com> <82c9dd70704191721u505ea1d1va888cc54bc1a9709@mail.gmail.com>

Eric,

This is why I set my rangefinder to slightly forward focus the  
Noctilux at f1. It's a compromise setting but all of my lenses stay  
in focus (except for the APO 135 at infinity) including the Noctilux  
at all stops.

Len


On Apr 19, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Eric Korenman wrote:

> Just got back from an afternoon out with a M8 and Noctliux.
> I never realized how dramatic the focus shift is when changing f  
> stops!
>
> IE, my RF is right on at f/1.0 but at f/2.0 - 2.8, the focus shifts
> dramatically backwards.
> A bit of googling confirms that this effect.
> The digital sensor makes things more severe as film was more forgiving
> with its relative 'thickness'
>
> Eric
>
> On 4/19/07, Marty Deveney <freakscene@weirdness.com> wrote:
>>  Hi George, >When I had a Noctilux I found the minimum focus  
>> distance a
>> constant
>> >annoyance. It seemed that I always wanted another 6 to 8 inches that
>> >wasn't available. This ultimately resulted in my selling the lens.
>> For which I am extremely, ongoingly grateful to you.
>> >So the question: Do those of you who may have had similar feelings
>> >when using the Noctilux on an M2,3,4, 5, 6 or 7 feel that this
>> >limitation has been softened when using it on the M8?
>> The main problem with using the Nocti on my M7 was always that I  
>> had to
>> swap lenses to get closer focus and that therefore when I travel I  
>> need
>> totake the Nocti and a 50/2 (used to be a Summicron, currently  
>> playingwith
>> a Pentax 43). The M8 makes the Nocti more challenging in some ways  
>> - the
>> digital sensoris less tolerant of focus errors, the lower mag  
>> viewfinder
>> makes focus generallyharder (get a magnifier) but the ~65mm  
>> equivalent
>> goes a long way towards makingthat 1m close focus less of an  
>> issue.  It's
>> a great lens and I think the M8 makes it an even better lens.  It
>> definitely teaches you how little is in focus at 1m at f1 and also  
>> how
>> marvellously dreamy that low-contrast, much fine detail  
>> obliterated look
>> can be.I also use it a lot for waist-up and head-and-shoulders  
>> work at
>> f2.8-4, particularly for weddings.  Brides and their mothers seem to
>> think the Nocti makes them look better. Just my current thoughts (the
>> Nocti was the only M-mount lens I had when I got my M8). Later, Marty
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)
In reply to: Message from freakscene at weirdness.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)
Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)