Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There's a good book that looks at this issue from several perspectives: straight photography, pictorialism, documentary, and fine art photography. It's Joel Eisinger's "Trace and Transformation." UNM Press:1995. The title gives a hint to the ideas behind the discussion. All photographs reveal a trace of some original object or event, and all photographs transform the original into something completely different. Compare an actual person to a monochrome 2-D snapshot of him. You won't have any trouble telling which is which. ;-) Here's a sample from the chapter on documentary photography: "Those directly involved in documentary photography understood not only the degree to which they selected the truth but also the degree to which they inflected it. Such inflection comes about, in part, through the unavoidable choices of camera angle, length of lens, lighting, and so on, choices every photographer makes all the time. But the documentary pho- tographers also shaped the truth by directing human subjects and arrang- ing inanimate subject matter. Documentarians, however, did not write about these aspects of their work until years later, so it was not something the public or the critics of documentary photography were aware of. In general, contemporary writing on documentary photography hardly ques- tioned the assumption that photographs show an unambiguous truth." I found this on Questia, the online library. I just might have to subscribe. What a great way to access books! -- Phil Swango 307 Aliso Dr SE Albuquerque, NM 87108 505-262-4085