Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The only problem I had with mine was the rangefinder losing calibration over time, probably the vibration of carrying it. This problem is common to the almost identical unit in the Cosina Voigtlander film cameras too. It too is a bit too IR sensitive, as I have read are several of the Nikon digital SLRs. I do have some great shots using my RD1 and have only needed to reset the rangefinder once since i bought it. It would not surprise me to find that all the focusing inaccuracies being reported on the net for the M8 have always existed on M cameras but were so difficult for an owner to check that the spotlight was never on them. When one considers that some pretty massive design compromises have to be chosen in the design of fast lenses, particularly wide angle ones, it is not surprising to me to hear of these compromises being brought to light by digital immediacy ie the ability to immediately look at each picture. It is well documented that two of the compromises accepted in the Noctilux to get the f1 speed are focus shift with aperture and about 3 stops of vignetting. It also has relatively poor performance at close distances, floating elements are the usual way of compensating for this inherent problem in lenses and they are not part of the Noctilux design. Somebody at Leica will have chosen an aperture at which the rangefinder matches the point of focus, with compromise at other apertures. It would appear that this aperture was not chosen as f1. I find this surprising, since this would be presumably the aperture at which any compromise would be most obvious. The fact that so many people report a back focus on their Noctilux of around 5" at 5ft implies to me that that is what you get with the compromise at "factory spec". All of this is exacerbated by the ease with which the results can be examined. When I set 1:1 in Lightroom my I am looking at a section of my M8 pictures which would be from a 33" x 22" print, I am examining it from about 20". I would never have been so exigent with film so the "defects" I may notice on digital would never have been evident to me on film. Anyway after doing a few tests, I even dug out my old f1.2 Noctilux, and having a bit of fun, I went back to taking pictures and doing a few prints. They are spectacular. The size quality ratio has reached a completely new level with the M8 in my experience. Brilliant! Frank On 16 Apr, 2007, at 00:05, Jeff Matsler wrote: > What were the problems with the RD1? I've heard people say there > were issues, but I don't know that I've ever heard what the issues > were. > > Jeff M > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Victor Rubin" <vroger@gmail.com> > To: "lug" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 6:01 PM > Subject: [Leica] Back to basics, this time... > > >> Philppe wrote: >> An RD-1 maybe? >> >> RD 1, of course, is the answer- especially now (tongue in cheek) >> when they >> are no longer being produced, and are sold, (when available) for >> 1/2 price >> in a reconditioned condition. Regrettably, the camera, again, had >> too many >> problems. Were a rangefinder digital to come out for $1,500- I'd >> do it. >> Vroger >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information