Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photofreek?
From: don.dory at (Don Dory)
Date: Thu Mar 29 19:00:03 2007
References: <> <001701c77258$46837fa0$a302a8c0@ted> <> <> <>

Guys and Gals,
It has been a semi-enjoyable running joke but time to quit now.  Carried any
further and one of our saloon mates may feel uncomfortable.  The bar keep is
satisfied; I trust Seth's judgement, and Doug is a straight shooter so
enough.  Tilley hats have been reopened, we have a member who values a car
more than his M8 (GASP), Ted has been talking again, and Missy might be
Graham's muse.

Go out and take some pictures, you will feel better and we will have
something to talk about.

On 3/29/07, Brian Reid <> wrote:
> Seth was talking about the person who posts as
> > ah,  but is Seth talking about Photofreek or Photo Phreak?
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information


In reply to: Message from ricc at (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
Message from tedgrant at (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
Message from reid at (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
Message from kididdoc at (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Photofreek?)
Message from reid at (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Photofreek?)