Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, this pointer is pointless - we neither see the horse nor its mouth and this is only chitchat without any grounded evidence - anyone could write this kind of review I'm afraid. Mind you, NO polemics inside - just a feeling that hands on experience and bench tests are better than gossip and verbose buck/quality ratios drawn from whose nose was it? Straightforwardly but friendly yours Phil...x Mark Rabiner wrote: >Here's Ken Rockwells take on >Nikon 12 - 24 mm f/4, Tokina 12 - 24 mm f/4, Sigma 10 - 20 mm f/4 - 5.6 and >Tamron 11 - 18 mm f/4.5 - 5.6. > > >http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/digital-wide-zooms/comparison.htm > > >He says the best one is the Canon. > > >Which you may notice is not on the list. >" The Canon 10 - 22 mm is better than any of these four lenses, including >the Nikon." He doesn't shoot with Canon so that's saying a lot. > > > >Mark Rabiner >8A/109s >New York, NY > >markrabiner.com > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > >