Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/03/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: OT, now computer stuff RE: [Leica] Re: HD to replace JPG
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Wed Mar 28 19:40:32 2007
References: <C2307B66.9877%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk><44D6010CBE87001ADEDFCB48@hindolveston.reid.org><8B1957667B854B13B854D0F5785ADD42@Vista> <200703281844.18789.photo.forrest@earthlink.net> <000901c771aa$b1be0d70$6501a8c0@asus930>
> I was surprised to read Brian's comments re DivX, though.
> I never heard about outrage or a
> slow and painful death of the format. Brian, did you mean in commercial
> players? I would be greatly inconvenienced without that
> codec.
If you go back to my original post, you'll see that I said DIVX and not DivX.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DivX#Name
DivX is cute and useful. DIVX was raw unadulterated greed.
Replies:
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) (OT, now computer stuff RE: [Leica] Re: HD to replace JPG)
In reply to:
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Re: HD to replace JPG)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: HD to replace JPG)
Message from bill at photobynelsch.com (Bill) ([Leica] Re: HD to replace JPG)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Re: HD to replace JPG)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) (OT, now computer stuff RE: [Leica] Re: HD to replace JPG)