Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] I'm blaming Ted!
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Tue Mar 27 01:46:34 2007
References: <23445.26730.qm@web34205.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 
Hi Jerry,
your statement is miles from my experience.
Digital is MUCH better than film for everything I do. In fact I would  
say that unless you use slow hi res B&W film and your camera is  
always on a tripod the potential extra resolution of film (its only  
theoretical benefit over digital, it is already inferior in every  
other way) will never be actually visible/useable.
Frank


On 26 Mar, 2007, at 23:31, Photo Phreak wrote:

> Digital is convenient, but the quality is still not equal to film.
Replies: Reply from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Film/Digital (was: I'm blaming Ted))
 In reply to: Message from leicam4pro at yahoo.com (Photo Phreak) ([Leica] I'm blaming Ted!)