Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 8:21 PM -0400 3/23/07, Dante Stella wrote: >For people who have used M8s for a while, do you need accelerated SD >cards with the camera? Or is the normal SD write speed generally >sufficient for M-type pictures? I don't see filling up a huge >buffer, and from what I have read, it would be 5 seconds write time >per card for standard-speed SD. > >The reason I ask is that my Kodak 14n really likes Microdrives or >accelerated CF - but when writing to the SD card, it doesn't seem to >care how fast the card is. > >Thanks >Dante Dante, the fast cards do make a difference. I've tried fast cards and slow cards and I've shot single shots and continuous, and I've tried DNG only, jpeg only and DNG and jpeg. The fastest is DNG only on fast cards. The cards I've been using are the Sandisk Ultra II one and two GB cards, because that is what I had lying around. The slow are the PNY 2GB, because, well, they were really cheap. In single DNG shots, the camera finished writing to the card in exactly half the time (as near as I can tell) as the slow card, and you can't press 'play' and see the image again until the writing has finished. DNG is faster than jpeg by a large factor (nearly 2, depending on circumstances), and DNG plus jpeg is slowest. High quality or low quality or resolution size don't seem to make a lot of difference, although there is some. The time to flush the buffer after a string of 11 continuous shots is by far fastests with DNG only and a fast card, but here the card speed is a lot less important than doing DNG only. These trials only took maybe 15min, and they gave me a clear idea of the performance to be expected. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com