Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Graham, thank you for the tip, which I've tried to put to good use. I was unfortunately in town and couldn't get a GeeBee background and sky. But I tried my luck on some reflexions. Here <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Noir+et+Blanc/To-GeeBee-bw-w.jpg.html> is one I like and which I am thankful to you for tipping me off on how to. Boots are at the ready?. Enjoy your weekend hike Phil...x An afterthought on language : you wrote "burn" and I didn't get it immediately as in my language when a slide is "burned " it means highlights are way too light. I guess you meant the converse, didn't you? . geebee wrote: > From: "Philippe Amard" <phamard@numericable.fr> > Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG : #056 - Now - what's the trick > >> So my technical question is about how you measure light when you have >> so much contrast, so as to preserve details as you do. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Philippe, > > I angle the camera down to take a reading off the foreground after > selecting an aperture with sufficient depth of field to hold focus > from nearest object to the horizon (not an issue in this shot) then I > leave the rest to camera and film latitude. The sky will be too light > in a straight print/scan but it will retain enough detail for me to > 'burn' it in when I get the scene into PhotoShop. The red filter added > dramatic effect by darkening what look like the black areas in the sky > but which were in fact inky blue clouds. > > Hope that helps. > > --Graham > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >