Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Not very with it so...
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Sat Mar 10 18:17:55 2007
References: <C218B0C6.48794%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I use 400 chrome, and I often have the aperture pegged at f1.4. With  
a max of f4, I would either have to use flash or put the camera away.

John Collier

On 10-Mar-07, at 5:00 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> On 3/10/07 6:20 PM, "John Collier" <jbcollier@shaw.ca> typed:
>
>> No pics from the Tri-E. I just tried out how it handles.
>>
>> I don't mind new Asph lenses replacing their old siblings but not if
>> the speed drops. I wonder if the rangefinder of the M8 has trouble
>> with the 75/1.4?
>>
>> John Collier
>>
>
>
> Me I love slow glass. Compact. Light. Cheap. With an easy touch.
> With an eeentsy beetsy chip of a piece of glass in the front.
> No flair issues. Easy to clean. Doesn't attract undue attention.
>
> Especially on my Leica M system where there is no issue as to how  
> hard its
> going to focus.
> Nor how bright the viewing is going to be. As there is not a ground  
> glass
> issue.
> Unless you've got the thing hooked up to your Viso.
> I'm hankering for the new 28 2.8 ASPH.
> High on my list is the collapsible 50 Elmar.
> And anything else slow small and compact they can come up with.
> Or old stuff from the 50's.
> Leitz Wetzlar
> F 3.5 and be there.

In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Not very with it so...)