Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Oh, but even at 400 I like to shoot wide open ;-) Philippe Op 10-mrt-07, om 23:12 heeft Luis Ripoll het volgende geschreven: > Yes Philippe, > > This is the big prblem, I think is better use a 400 ASA on this > camera to > have a good depth of field > > Saludos cordiales > Luis > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En > nombre de > Philippe Orlent > Enviado el: s?bado, 10 de marzo de 2007 22:57 > Para: Leica Users Group > Asunto: Re: [Leica] With the Rollei 35S > > I liked the Rollei more than the CL. Not for ergonomics part, but > such much > more character. > The CL felt a bit flimsy to me, but the Rollei: like welded out of > solid > stainless steel. And a stubborn kind of quirkyness. > Compared to an M, no match at all though. > I made one of my alltime favorite shots with it. But to many missed > ones > next to it. As I already said, I never got used to guesstimating the > distance. > > Philippe > > > > Op 10-mrt-07, om 22:44 heeft Luis Ripoll het volgende geschreven: > >> Hi Philippe, >> >> I've never tried a CL, it's bigger than a Rollei 35S but with >> rangefinder focusing!, on the other hand the 35S even if it is not >> ergonomic - you are right - it is really a toy on your hands...., >> well >> when a man are in love with different cameras.... >> >> Thank you very much for your kind comments >> >> Saludos cordiales >> Luis >> >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org >> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En >> nombre de Philippe Orlent Enviado el: s?bado, 10 de marzo de 2007 >> 22:08 >> Para: Leica Users Group >> Asunto: Re: [Leica] With the Rollei 35S >> >> It is a wonderful lens. The camera itself is a bit quirky, but I got >> used to that. But the guess the distance thing of it never worked >> with >> me. >> You did some geat work with it. Meaning that in the hands of a >> capable >> person, the lens quality is at least on par with 'any' Leica 40mm (or >> any 35 or 50 from that era at 2.8). >> But on camera body ergonomics, nothing can beat a Leica. >> Thanks for showing, >> Philippe >> >> >> >> Op 10-mrt-07, om 21:19 heeft Luis Ripoll het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Talking about the difference we can appreciate between Leica and >>> others seeing through a monitor, here I've posted some pictures with >>> my Rollei 35S, all with TX..., opinions.... >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Rollei+35S/ >>> 070202-02_1w.jpg.html >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Rollei+35S/ >>> 070202-03_2w.jpg.html >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Rollei+35S/ >>> 070202-25w.jpg.html >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Rollei+35S/ >>> 070202-24w.jpg.html >>> >>> Saludos desde Barcelona >>> Luis >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >