Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Leica] which medium format?
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Wed Feb 28 00:38:08 2007
References: <357F978C-07C0-438E-9802-2130DEEE8684@mindspring.com> <49574.203.193.210.171.1172462480.squirrel@webmail.ncable.net.au> <45E51EDA.5050008@nathanfoto.com> <A4C0131A-D922-4B55-8C03-1C0EDA7243AF@interlink.es>
On 2/28/07, Luis Miguel Casta?eda <lmc@interlink.es> wrote:
> Afaik, from an Ilford staff member, the sales of 120 film although ok
> from the profit point of view are just a little fraction of the 35mm
> market.
Profit is what they care about (need) :-)
Sounds good, for both 120 and 35mm.
Daniel
Replies:
Reply from nickbroberts at yahoo.co.uk (Nick Roberts) ([Leica] which medium format?)
In reply to:
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] which medium format?)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] which medium format?)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] which medium format?)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([SPAM] Re: [Leica] which medium format?)