Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 2/25/07 3:22 PM, "Marc James Small" <marcsmall@comcast.net> typed: > At 02:32 PM 2/25/2007, Adam Bridge wrote: >> The GPS constellation orbits about 12,000 miles above the surface, NOT >> in low Earth orbit. The satellite the Chinese hit was about 500 miles >> up. This is useful for hitting spy satellites but getting up to 12,000 >> miles is a different kettle of fish and MUCH more difficult. There's >> a reason they are that high. >> >> Add in the ESA constellation at 14,000 miles or so and you have a >> difficult problem. Vehicles built to reach either constellation are >> NOT aircraft launchable and I think they are sufficiently large as to >> be not portable-launch either. >> >> Since shooting at either constellation would be a serious act of war >> in and of itself a ballistic response to the launch sites would be >> possible and likely. I believe no nation on the planet has the launch >> capability to go after the constellations at one time. The launch >> facilities would be unlikely to survive a reload. So you might hit a >> segment of GPS or Galileo's capability but you'd be hard pressed to >> get a lot of them. > > All excellent points, Adam. However: > > The Red Chinese do not have the capability to > take out the GPS satellites TODAY. They are > working to have that capability within a decade > and may well do so. We also do not know what > effect EMP will have on the GPS grid. The recent > test was just a first trial of what appears to be a lengthy program. > > The Chinese would only take out the GPS > satellites if war with the US were imminent. It > would be an act of war. They would only do this > to hinder our ability to bomb their cities and > installations, which would also be an act of > war. I do not believe that the PRC is actively > working towards war; it simply seems committed > to maintaining peace by being prepared for war. > > US defense analysts have been quite concerned > over this for the past decade or so. That's why > the military services continue to use celestial > navigation as a back-up system. > > Sobering thoughts. > > msmall@aya.yale.edu > Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! > > > Yes but all the millions of GPS using Chinese would really get ticked off and they vote. The Chinese military are making sure they are GPS non dependant? I think that would be tricky as of late you cant get a leather strap for case which is not GPS dependent. I think my new shoe laces are GPS dependant. Mark Rabiner 8A/109s New York, NY markrabiner.com