Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I vote old format. Gene -------------- Original message from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>: -------------- > I'm also strongly in favour of going back to the old format. > > The LUG volume hasn't bothered me, even if I only get to read 10% of > it at times. > > The new format not only likely causes me to miss some responses, but > then also puts multiple copies into my mailbox(es) if someone > responds to one of my posts. > > I usually hit option-reply on Eudora, which used to just put a reply > header on LUG mail. Now it does that, and replies to everyone else > who had previously been replied to. > > So now, if I just hit option-reply in a thread which has had a number > of responses, I'll generate as many e-mails as all the people who > have previously responded plus one. > > I could wind up with 20 copies of the same message! > > I know the header should be edited, but the problem with the previous > format was lack of header editing. If the same lack of editing > happens now, the LUG volume could increase greatly, but due to a lot > of redundant posts. > > Please, please, back to the old. :-) > > -- > * Henning J. Wulff > /|\ Wulff Photography & Design > /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com > |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information