Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Google
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Wed Feb 14 11:42:09 2007
References: <1be504db0702140736t39e3b813vdbbe7d18e3602c9b@mail.gmail.com> <4cfa589b0702140944v7ce7566fn528af40885eaed08@mail.gmail.com> <45D35DF4.2020107@nathanfoto.com> <5E8A7CC846DF425B6E845A8D@dhcp-wi-45.sql1.isc.org> <6e74b3700702141140m6be4dfb2m807ecff69d1f3ef8@mail.gmail.com>
> But for different reasons - presumably?
I don't think so. Perhaps different paths coming to the same conclusion, but
the result is the same.
Replies:
Reply from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Google Library Article)
Reply from simon.ogilvie at gmail.com (Simon Ogilvie) ([Leica] Google)
In reply to:
Message from pswango at att.net (Phil Swango) ([Leica] A few photos)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] A few photos)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Google)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Google)
Message from simon.ogilvie at gmail.com (Simon Ogilvie) ([Leica] Google)