Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Mon Feb 12 09:01:41 2007
References: <3280493C-7263-4F11-BD0E-F63FE0ED2D6C@pandora.be>
 
24-70 L USM: Wonderful, Sharp, Fast.
70-200 L IS USM: Wonderful, Sharp, Fast.
10-22 EF-S USM: Wonderful, Extremely Sharp (won't work on 5D
These are my only Canon lenses. All the primes I use with Canon are  
Glass.
The 16-35 L USM version I had was a loser. Not sharp (may have been a  
single instance issue - I've heard others speak well of it)

Only one M lens: would be the 35 lux asph and 28 cron asph ;~)

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Feb 10, 2007, at 12:13 PM, Philippe Orlent wrote:

> What are your impressions of the following lenses?
> Canon EF 24-70mm L f2.8 USM
>
> Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
>
> Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8L USM
>
> And, if you'd only keep one lens on your analog M, which one would  
> that be?
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
 In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)