Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun Feb 11 09:55:36 2007
References: <3280493C-7263-4F11-BD0E-F63FE0ED2D6C@pandora.be> <007501c74d5d$979db1a0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <7.0.1.0.2.20070210165455.024047a0@infoave.net>

Thanks Tina,
I agree with you after having read all the feedback, but 85 as a  
single lens is just too tele for me. I just wish I had an unlimited  
budget, then things would be pretty easy...
Kind regards,
Philippe


Op 10-feb-07, om 22:56 heeft Tina Manley het volgende geschreven:

> At 04:51 PM 2/10/2007, you wrote:
>> Now if you think the "Leica one lens only" theory with Canon, you  
>> may want to check out the 85/1.2. That's an amazing lens.
>>
>> For keeping just one Leica lens, I'd go with the 35/f2 'cron.
>>
>> Chris
>
> I agree with both of these suggestions.  The 85/1.2 is a phenomenal  
> lens and the 35/2 ASPH is amazing.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/portfolio
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)