Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Mon Jan 29 17:25:04 2007
References: <C1E3F188.436AD%mark@rabinergroup.com> <C43C77F2-25F1-4491-A088-08B32FF60DD9@gilplant.com>

Aperture 1.5.1 (or whatever the most recent is) does handle the M8's
DNG format just fine. Not sure about the DMR's.

Adam

Send me one and I'll try it.

AB

On 1/29/07, J. Gilbert Plantinga <lists@gilplant.com> wrote:
> For me it's a no-brainer until Apple adds support for the RAW .dng
> files from my DMR, and I suppose that would go for M8 users too. I've
> just started playing with the Lightroom beta, and thus far it rocks
> on both my MacPro and MacBook Pro.
>
> Gilbert
>
> On Jan 29, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
> > Sounds like a great thing but the obvious comparison question is
> > how does it
> > stack up to APPLE APERTURE? I'm sure that could be found all over
> > but I know
> > the people here. And I know some have used both. And both seem to
> > be for the
> > same things. No ones chiming in WHAT!?!!?! get Aperture instead so
> > I assume
> > its not a big deal. And I'm working off laptops not mainframes.
> > That would
> > be an APPLE drawback as I understand it. They build software to try
> > to make
> > you get a bigger newer computer. Gates thinks you can use an old
> > Laptop as
> > far as he cares. Didn't use to be like that.
> > When Word 4 came out you needed a new computer to run it.
> > Something like that.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture)
Message from lists at gilplant.com (J. Gilbert Plantinga) ([Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture)