Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Mon Jan 29 16:53:48 2007
References: <p06240800c1e4344fe174@10.0.1.6> <C1E3F188.436AD%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Yup - well worth the $199 price.
$99 would have been a bargain and $399 too much to pay.

I have been trying to guess what the price would be and my internal
price point was about $300. So count me in.

LR ahoy,
Eric



On 1/29/07, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> On 1/29/07 6:34 PM, "Allen Graves" <allen.graves@charter.net> typed:
>
> > Anybody here like Adobe Lightroom enough to pay $299 for it?
> > Introductory price $199.
> >
> > http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/
> >
> > Full price seems a little steep to me unless they have added a fair
> > amount of function to the beta.
> >
> > Allen
>
> Sounds like a great thing but the obvious comparison question is how does 
> it
> stack up to APPLE APERTURE? I'm sure that could be found all over but I 
> know
> the people here. And I know some have used both. And both seem to be for 
> the
> same things. No ones chiming in WHAT!?!!?! get Aperture instead so I assume
> its not a big deal. And I'm working off laptops not mainframes. That would
> be an APPLE drawback as I understand it. They build software to try to make
> you get a bigger newer computer. Gates thinks you can use an old Laptop as
> far as he cares. Didn't use to be like that.
> When Word 4 came out you needed a new computer to run it.
> Something like that.
>
> Mark Rabiner
> New York, NY
> 40?47'59.79"N
> 73?57'32.37"W
>
> markrabiner.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Adobe Lightroom Vs. Apple Aperture)