Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Neopan 400
From: harrison at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary)
Date: Tue Nov 28 07:02:10 2006
References: <200611280002.kAS02JbZ014999@server1.waverley.reid.org> <001601c7128c$ef5f2560$6501a8c0@asus930> <200611280512.kAS5Cnj3028053@server1.waverley.reid.org>
 
Marc James Small wrote:
>
>
> So, if you find Neopan friendly to your needs, I apologize.  I simply 
> find it an unworkable film with little apparent benefit and much 
> difficulty.  Perhaps I ought to try it again.

Marc,

I have found Neopan 400 to be a very nice B&W film.  I like the look it 
gives when souped in HC110.  But then I am an old newsie who learned to 
develop his B&W in hot HC110 on deadlines...I like grain and high contrast.

-- 
Harrison McClary
Harrison McClary Photography
harrison@mcclary.net
http://www.mcclary.net
ImageStockSouth - Stock Photography
http://www.imagestocksouth.com
Tobacco Road: Personal Blog:
http://web.mac.com/whmcclary/iWeb/tobacco-road/Blog/Blog.html
Replies: Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] Neopan 400)
 In reply to: Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] First test Summicron Collapsible)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] First test Summicron Collapsible)
Message from marcsmall at comcast.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] Neopan 400)