Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I am sorry what i mean is D-Lux3, i dont know about Digilux 3. JSJ On 11/19/06, Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> wrote: > Way to opinionated: it is unacceptable to you and probably many > others, but its likely to be around the noise of the E-500 and I find > that usable in situations where I would otherwise not get an image. > Here for example at 800: noise yes, useless and unacceptable is up to > the observer. > > On 19/11/2006, at 13:35, Jerry Justianto wrote: > > > The ISO above 400 is unacceptable. > > > > JSJ > > > > On 11/16/06, Bob Shaw <rsphotoimages@comcast.net> wrote: > >> Saw and handled this camera at the recent Seattle area Leica > >> Akademie. > >> > >> Thing I really liked was - interchangeable lenses - and an optional > >> adaptor for Leica R lenses. > >> > >> And of course there will be other DigiLux 3 lenses to follow in 2007. > >> Larger sensor with larger pixels with CMOS LIve chip hence way fewer > >> noise issues due to heat buildup. > >> > >> Not Solms-built APO or Asph glass, but also not your Solms prices but > >> commendable optics for the the sensor at a more affordable price > >> point. > >> > >> So: any images out there, any owner (not website/magazine) reports? > >> > >> Thank you . > >> > >> Bob in Seattle. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >