Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: PS Re: [Leica] DMR DNG profile hell !
From: robinsnes at comcast.net (Roger Skully)
Date: Tue Nov 14 10:57:23 2006
References: <380-22006112141823132@M2W031.mail2web.com> <50A6B3FA001985874C3E2556@scarborough.isc.org>

Just to take the opposite tack...I have found that Spyder improved my  
prints in both my Epson stylus photo 960 and in my 2400. Wouldn't  
dream of not using it on a regular basis. Just my humble opinion.
Roger Skully
Robin's Nest Photography
On Nov 14, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Brian Reid wrote:

> Same here. I tried it for 6 months; it made things worse, not better.
>
>
>> I had a Spyder briefly.  To make a long story short, eyeball  
>> calibration
>> works much better for me.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (telyt@earthlink.net) (PS Re: [Leica] DMR DNG profile hell !)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) (PS Re: [Leica] DMR DNG profile hell !)