Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Rebadged 4/3 lenses
From: gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO)
Date: Fri Oct 20 06:58:02 2006
References: <cdc7ada336731.4537efa0@shaw.ca> <002301c6f3f1$074702c0$6601a8c0@asus930>
 
G Hopkinson writes:

> Greg, I'm almost certain we have some LUG folk with different 
> opinions on the utility of the four thirds system! What I meant was
> that the Digilux 3 seems oddly positioned to me compared to the M8.
> Like the sort of DSLR that an M user might buy, except that now.....
> Cheers
> Hoppy
> 

Hoppy,

If you are saying it is a distraction. I agree.

Not good to confuse people with too many product lines.

They need to spend more effort on digital R's imho.


Regards,

Greg
In reply to: Message from gregj.lorenzo at shaw.ca (GREG LORENZO) ([Leica] Re: Rebadged 4/3 lenses)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] Re: Rebadged 4/3 lenses)