Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
From: rhc3vt at hotmail.com (Richard Coutant)
Date: Wed Sep 27 07:28:07 2006

You mean they're not all like that?


>From: "G Hopkinson" <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au>
>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
>Subject: RE: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
>Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:06:55 +1000
>
>Richard I have this one too, and also the T3 & TVS111. When Kyocera stopped 
>production they were given away at fire sale prices new,
>locally. But the time to save an image is horrendous on the TVS digital. 
>Definitely the lenses are sharp and saturated. Plus it
>suffers from my inability to focus clearly on an LCD AND a subject at the 
>same time. I've relegated mine to on a tripod for pics of
>goodies to sell on the Bay.
>
>Cheers
>Hoppy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
>[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>Richard Coutant
>Sent: Wednesday, 27 September 2006 09:56
>To: lug@leica-users.org
>Subject: RE: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
>
>I bought a Contax Tvs digital, not to replace but to go with my T2.  One in
>each pocket...  I have nothing to compare it with since it's the only
>digital camera I've used, but it seems to me to produce frighteningly good
>images.
>
>Richard
>
>
> >From: "Eric Korenman" <faneuil@gmail.com>
> >Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> >To: LUG <lug@leica-users.org>
> >Subject: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
> >Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:37:35 -0400
> >
> >Yeah I'd love to have an M8. blah ditty blah.
> >
> >But what I am really looking for is the best digital replacement for my
> >pocket ultra sharp film cameras.
> >IE - what digital cameras compete well to replace the Contax T (or T3, or
> >Rollei 35 for that matter)
> >
> >I have strongly considered the Ricoh GRD. While the GR1v I owned was a
> >stunner, 28mm FOV is a bit too wide for my taste.
> >
> >Dream camera (at this nanosecond) would be somthing like the GRD with a
> >40mm
> >lens and faster RAW write time.
> >Also considering the LX2 but I haven't gotten my hands on one yet.
> >A digital Leica CM would fit the bill nicely.
> >
> >cameras I should consider?
> >
> >Eric
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)