Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/22[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Well David - if the Frontier scans gave you what you wanted the discussion becomes mute. But I would rather have your coast to coast histograms on file. As Ansel (so they say) suggested, "the negative (chrome, RAW file, in other words the original) is the score, the print is the performance (how you interpret the score). I want as much information as possible in the original so I have options in the performance. YMMV ;-) Regards, George Lottermoser firstname.lastname@example.org On Sep 22, 2006, at 3:32 PM, David Rodgers wrote: > The Frontier scans looked a lot better than my scans. > Yet the Frontier files were 8-bit and mine were 16-bit. The > Frontier had > narrow histograms. Mine ran coast to coast.