Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Kodak and Leica
From: lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin)
Date: Thu Sep 21 10:46:27 2006
References: <200609201901.k8KJ1LvK036521@server1.waverley.reid.org>

On Sep 20, 2006, at 3:01 PM, lBob wrote:

>
> "The design of the Leica M8 and Kodak sensor took a couple years,"
>
> Hmmmm. So they really DID have something up their sleeves. All done in
> the spirit of Kodachrome, I hope.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Adler [mailto:rgacpa@pacbell.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 5:43 PM
> To: Leica Enthusiasts Group; Leica Users Group
> Subject: [Leica] Kodak Sensor in M8
>
> For those interested in such stuff:
> http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Kodak-KAF-10500-CCD-Debuts- 
> in-L
> eica-M8-.htm
> or
> http://tinyurl.com/pebu7
>
> Bob Adler
> Palo Alto, CA
> http://www.raflexions.com


Re the Kodak press release:
______
"In addition to the micro lens, the Kodak sensor helps keep the Leica  
body small applying with its infrared light filter coating directly  
on its glass. Unlike other cameras that contain an extra element to  
filter IR light, the Leica M8 contains the IR filter right on the  
sensor to conserve space. ?There is not an additional element in  
place,? said DeLuca, ?but [the camera sensor] still has the IR- 
absorbing characteristics.?

When asked why Kodak and Leica opted for a CCD sensor over a CMOS  
sensor, DeLuca said, ?It was very clear the full frame CCD was the  
path to go down because of the performance it was able to provide.?
_______

Is the term "full frame" in the last paragraph an indication of  
things to come or was it just an unfortunate slip of the tongue?

Larry Z

Replies: Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Re: Kodak and Leica)
Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Re: Kodak and Leica)