Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Something different
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Wed Sep 20 11:46:39 2006
References: <EC2E5BFB-248A-4124-A0DF-123AF84C6B0E@pandora.be> <E71BB5DE-CABE-4C2E-B440-0AB8F6371CAE@cox.net> <p06230915c13739931638@[131.142.12.152]>

Finally, it is always the client that decides which ones are used. b  
and c were what I recommended. They preferred the expression of a,  
but that one is just too sweet and expected IMO.
There were a lot of better and funnier shots of him. But lawyers do  
not like 'risks'. And they do see risks anywhere.
It had to be what I call "John Pumpernickle III, founding senior  
partner of Pumpernickle, Weisenfr?st and partners staff room" portraits.
But 2 out of 3 ain't bad in advertising. Most of the time the  
difference between strong initial concept and final client signed  
result is somewhat different.
Which is strange: imagine me saying to a lawyer (just as an example:  
I have no problems with lawyers at all): 'I do not like your approach  
on this matter. Instead of case x, use case y as an argument. And  
throw that law article 546 bis in, instead of your suggested article  
259 ter."
We get to hear this all the time. So many people that think they know  
something about advertising...

PS: the body is of a 6 year old.



Op 20-sep-06, om 20:32 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende geschreven:

> All really nice but must agree on #3.  It brought an involuntary  
> smile to my face.
>
>> On Sep 20, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Philippe Orlent wrote:
>>
>>> 3 baby portraits. And yes, there was some PS involved :-)
>>> It's for a recruitment campaign for a law firm.
>>> I'm pretty proud of it. Let me know what you think.
>>>
>>> www.fullflavor.be/a.jpg
>>> www.fullflavor.be/b.jpg
>>> www.fullflavor.be/c.jpg
>>
>>
>> nice idea,  the third is best...   I showed them to my daughter  
>> who wants to line up an interview with them...
>>
>>
>> so it appears to work...
>>
>>
>> Steve
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking,
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Dick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Something different)
In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Something different)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Something different)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Something different)