Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Trying to understand M8
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Tue Sep 19 10:29:16 2006
References: <45066CC50009E8DA@ctsmtpout2.frontal.correo> <440b792d0609161114s4b910f6et3382cd081be0e2ba@mail.gmail.com> <3be709c70290f30ae73783d481a0fbd9@earthlink.net> <440b792d0609161612t3f157372pc8a0cf2bd81e6559@mail.gmail.com> <aeef8eba182c550c1a801c64e2a47bd1@earthlink.net>
Nor with the 20d or 5d - Yes the highlights must be controlled but
the shadows hold huge amounts of detail.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
On Sep 16, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Douglas Herr wrote:
> Yes, but but setting exposure compensation to -1 stop I don't get
> ANY burned-out highlights. The fact remains that the DMR does not
> follow the rule-of-thumb, if there is one, that digital is as
> unforgiving of exposure errors as slide film. I do not find that
> to be true with the DMR.
In reply to:
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Trying to understand M8)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Trying to understand M8)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Trying to understand M8)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Trying to understand M8)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Trying to understand M8)