Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Trying to understand M8
From: jbcollier at (John Collier)
Date: Sun Sep 17 08:28:38 2006
References: <004601c6d9e8$0f8a74d0$c4f96b44@newukolbqveo9i>

Henning has tried out all the lenses he has, and that is quite a few  
including all the wide Voitinas, and they all work well on the M8;  
much better than they work on the RD1. So I wouldn't worry about  
coding issues.

There are other issues mind you; some cost related. I was doing some  
casual shooting at a friend's wedding last night. I had three bodies  
going. I suppose I could have got by with two but that is still a  
$10K investment. That is a long cool drink of water by any measure.  
Also 90% of my shooting is with reversal. I  really, really like the  
projected slide. I would have to sort that end of the equation too.  
The other significant issue is the lack of fast wides. I would need a  
28/1.4 no ifs and or buts about it.

The ability to free up one's shooting cannot be overstated. I think I  
will end up with a Leica M digital but not right away.

John Collier

On 16-Sep-06, at 5:30 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> I suppose that if I limited myself to just shooting with one or two  
> lenses,
> the cost would be inconsequential. But if non-coded lenses are an  
> issue with
> the M8, the lure of getting one because I could use it with the 20  
> some-odd
> M lenses I now have would be questionable. What would I do with the
> Voigtlander, Konica, and Zeiss lenses?

Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Trying to understand M8)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Trying to understand M8)