Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] gallery down?
From: eperea at walkereng.com (Emilio Perea)
Date: Fri Sep 15 23:40:22 2006
References: <FEF4523D-80BB-4053-BD39-22298B980BF1@mindspring.com> <35E296BC7688CEF0E290CD93@scarborough.isc.org> <B43951C4-70E5-4B52-BC86-96246C760DCD@mindspring.com> <4E7DCDB8535EDEFC189F76D9@scarborough.isc.org>

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:42:54PM -0700, Brian Reid wrote:
> 
> The electricians who came this morning to replace it said that it
> had been built with wire that was far too small for the
> application.  The circuit was 240 volts, 100 amperes, but 
> it had been wired with AWG 3 wire (5.83mm). The electrical code
> requires AWG 0 wire for that, and suggests AWG 00 (1cm) wire.

Although it has been quite a few years since I last messed with
electrical construction design, I am pretty sure that #3 wire is the
normal size to use for a 100 amp circuit.  A quick check of the online
National Electric Code 2005 Edition verifies this (for no more than
three current-carrying conductors in a raceway, based on an ambient
temperature of 30C).

Not knowing the details, I should probably not say more than if they
asked for a 100 amp circuit and got #3 wire, they got no less than they
asked for.  If they said they had a 100 amp _load_ and got #3 wire,
then they have a legitimate gripe.  If they don't understand the
difference, they need to do their homework or hire a pro. :-)

In reply to: Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] gallery down?)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] gallery down?)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] gallery down?)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] gallery down?)