Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Chris, I use a Nikon Coolscan V ED, and I find its really good. I also have an Epson 2450, but there is no comparision, the Nikon is streets ahead for 35mm. The only caveat is probably you are better off using Vuescan rather than Nikon Scan, but then you let go of Digital ICE - your choice! Cheers Jayanand Nathan Wajsman wrote: > Chris, > > I have the Epson 700 and I am very pleased with it. I use it for > scanning 6x6 film from my Hasselblad. I am sure it would do a credible > job on 35mm film too, but I hardly ever shoot that these days. And > when I do, once in a blue moon, then I still prefer my old Nikon > LS-2000. So, I think that if your main purpose is to scan 35mm film, > then you are better off buying a dedicated film scanner for that. > > Nathan > > Christopher Williams wrote: > >> Looking to get a new scanner. Thanks to the British pound vs US >> dollar, my old arse Canon 4000 went for some bucks. I still have my >> Epson 3200 which I really have no complaints with, just needs more >> resolution for 35mm scanning. Anyone using the new Epson V700 or V750 >> Pro? Looks like the Pro packs more software? I would swing for the >> Nikon 35mm scanners, but still want a MF scanner like my 3200. >> >> Any ideas, rants, ravings, or free food is appreciated. >> >> Chris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> > >