Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted, I'll explain it this way. You describe only one market segment. There are other market segments -- for instance people who may take 100 exposures in a month, or a year -- where shooting film may be cheaper/faster/easier in the long run, all things considered. daveR -----Original Message----- From: Ted Grant [mailto:tedgrant@shaw.ca] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:32 PM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Video of M8 David Rodgers offered: >> But I also don't think digital is necessarily across the board cheaper/faster/easier than film. <<<< Hello David That being the case would you please explain to those of us who shoot a great deal of stock photography, some who saved last year $20,000 dollars by shooting digital only? Simply by not purchasing a roll of film nor paid a dime for processing and had all our stuff in moments? Just wondered? thank you, ted tedgrantphoto.com Ted Grant Photography Limited 1817 Feltham Road Victoria BC V8N 2A4 250-477-2156