Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
From: kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier)
Date: Sat Sep 9 11:34:01 2006
References: <200609090023.k890MrHH021391@server1.waverley.reid.org> <0DEB6EDF-B23C-47B1-B500-4CBEE52FD652@optonline.net> <E6C31584-49C9-482A-BD1C-50EA2BCB0AA2@mac.com> <D9D90487-7AFF-4A72-8BA9-64D3CF2FB216@sololeicas.com> <ceb1a5650609090939x656d3450o36f6318d81cc03d2@mail.gmail.com>
On Sep 9, 2006, at 12:39 PM, Mark Langer wrote:
> 'd rate the 35/2, the 100/3.5 and the 100/2 as great lenses.
Thanks, Mark, and others, for all the good input. Sounds like I ned
to look more closely at the Canons.
Ken
-----------------------------------
The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
----------------------------------
Current Leica Photography (PESO):
http://gallery2.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/
Current Medium Format Photos:
http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn
Current Leica Photography (in move to new gallery)
http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r
Replies:
Reply from joelct at singnet.com.sg (Joseph Low) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
In reply to:
Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
Message from lists at sololeicas.com (Eduardo Albesi) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
Message from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)