Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: LTM lenses
From: lists at sololeicas.com (Eduardo Albesi)
Date: Sat Sep 9 09:19:29 2006
References: <200609090023.k890MrHH021391@server1.waverley.reid.org> <0DEB6EDF-B23C-47B1-B500-4CBEE52FD652@optonline.net> <E6C31584-49C9-482A-BD1C-50EA2BCB0AA2@mac.com>

Ken, try a Canon 35/2. It's an incredible performer. You can read the  
Dante Stella page about Canon LTM lenses for plenty of info and  
reviews. Other great lenses are the 100/3.5 and the 135/3.5

Best

Ed

El 09/09/2006, a las 12:04, Kenneth Frazier escribi?:

>
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:
>
>> The entire Canon line of LTM lenses is very good with performance  
>> indistinguishable from Leica lenses for the same camera.
>
> thanks, Larry.  Several folk have recommended this, and I'm looking  
> at the prices.
>
> Ken
> -----------------------------------
> The Rev. Kenneth Frazier
> Connecticut Conference, United Church of Christ
> ----------------------------------
> Current Leica Photography (PESO):
> http://gallery2.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/
>
> Current Medium Format Photos:
> http://tinyurl.com/bjvfn
>
> Current Leica Photography (in move to new gallery)
> http://tinyurl.com/6sc2r
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



Replies: Reply from langeratcarleton at gmail.com (Mark Langer) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)
Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Re: LTM lenses)