Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually the SL VF's are great with the big telys. I have my 560 Telyt on my SL aqnd it works great, very easy to focus anywhere on the screen. Gene -------------- Original message from "G Hopkinson" <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au>: -------------- > Now I've got to buy one for those slr moments....damn your eyes. > Ok so I need educating on the whole R world, more specifically which > lenses > suitable for the SLs etc. Not the big tele end ;-) > > Cheers > Hoppy > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > telyt@earthlink.net > Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2006 09:20 > To: lug@leica-users.org > Subject: RE: SLR viewfinders (was: Re: [Leica] M42x1-Canon EOS adapter > ...) > > G Hopkinson wrote: > > > Up until now, I'd always thought that my MF Nikons (FE2 F2, F3 etc > etc)were > > great finders vs all of the AF SLRs I've looked through. That is with > proper > > pentaprisms and the split image (which is what I used the most). I guess > > that's still valid, however you've explained that the SL & SL2 are much > > better again. Why doesn't that surprise me? > > Yup... I thought my Nikon FTn with E screen had a great viewfinder... and > it is... but the SL and SL2 are leaps and bounds ahead in terms of clarity > and ease of focus. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information