Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] dumb M-8 question.............
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Mon Aug 28 02:02:34 2006
 
Just as well this one arrived in time and saved me a lawsuit. I was just
about to dry Fluffy off after his bath.

Product Warning Advocate Hoppy
This post may contain traces of nuts

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Didier Ludwig
Sent: Monday, 28 August 2006 18:38
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] dumb M-8 question.............

Bill

I know in the US the juristic situation is really different, where people
get millions for compensation because they microwaved their poodle to death
and it was not mentioned in the manual not to do this. 

But as the M8 intelligence unit is british and the M8 camera german, US
lawyers might miss out this opportunity to enrich theirselves.

Didier
Replies: Reply from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] dumb M-8 question.............)
Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] dumb M-8 question.............)
 In reply to: Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] dumb M-8 question.............)