Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In the case of the 1.2 Noctilux one would have to add to its values: 1) Rarity - much like $5K wine 2) Build quality - much like the $5K wine 3) Brand - much like the $5K wine And of course the "no emotional or financial investment" is really the point. Expensive and high end items generally possess exceptional qualities as well as small groups of folks willing and able to invest emotion and money. And yes none of this has anything to do with, in the case of lenses, with simply the image quality; and in the case of wine, simply the taste (I'm not talking here of a $5 bottle - rather comparing a $355 bottle with $5K bottle). In fact, now that I think about about it - from what I hear the $5K bottles generally taste like s--t and are valued almost purely on their rarity and legend. I reckon the same would hold true for cars, boats, et al. Regards, George Lottermoser george@imagist.com On Aug 24, 2006, at 9:12 PM, B. D. Colen wrote: > show me the difference - other than > the size, the weight, and the cost...This is a lens that came with > a body I > bought in Ebay about a decade ago - I've got no emotional - or > financial - > investment in it, and haven't ever bothered with it.