Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photo contest rules/policy question
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Fri Aug 25 07:58:11 2006
References: <B71431C84ED03D84903BE451@scarborough.isc.org> <eoise2l4hglcokqqt6vd1re50mvi6icuct@4ax.com> <44EE51F3.4020606@adrenaline.com> <9b678e0608241830s558d9596o9093fed48fdc8cc9@mail.gmail.com> <p06230902c11404c121e2@[10.0.1.2]>

Also, the populist approach in no way prohibits the esteemed  
professionals (aka judges) on the list to comment constructively on  
the winners and losers.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Aug 24, 2006, at 8:50 PM, Richard S. Taylor wrote:

> As much as I'd like to hear the opinions of the very best on the  
> list, I still think the contest will run more smoothly and probably  
> longer if we go the populist route.
>
> It'll also minimize the effects of a judge who, for example, "just  
> can't stand peeling paint," or another look at Buddy the dog, or  
> another gorgeous flower, or, well. ... you get the idea.


In reply to: Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Photo contest rules/policy question)
Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Photo contest rules/policy question)
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Photo contest rules/policy question)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Photo contest rules/policy question)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] Photo contest rules/policy question)