Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm waiting. But can't it be Sharon Stone instead? Or, for that matter, Tim Robbins amorata, whose name, like everything else, escapes me at the moment. On 8/22/06 10:17 AM, "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote: > There is no doubt you've stumbled onto the perfect "aging movie star" > lens. It won't be long before Goldie Hawn will be knocking at your door. > :-P > > B. D. Colen wrote: > >> Hey, we went through that yesterday - it's the f 1.2 55 Olympus OM lens >> with >> it's silly millimeter of depth of field. :-) >> >> >> On 8/22/06 10:42 AM, "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Excellent wedding images, but soft focus effect? Argh. >>> >>> Chris >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "B.D. Colen" >>> Subject: [Leica] PAW and scenes from a wedding >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> PAW - http://gallery.leica-users.org/BDColen/Peter_Jana_3 >>>> ...which is taken from Scenes From A Wedding, a new folder under >>>> Weddings >>>> at...www.bdcolenphoto.com >>>> >>>> Enjoy - or don't. Whatever. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information