Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Jim: Jim: I have that one too, but I used the older 200mm because I wanted to see if its reputation for good bokeh is accurate. http://www.half-fast.com/Takumar-200/Takumar-200.jpg I counted 18 aperture blades... which was a big surprise to me. It's pretty easy to use with the isDS set on aperture priority. For the following photos I set the ISO to 1600 so that I could shoot at f5.6 to f11, but with fast shutter speeds to catch the movements of the swimming birds. http://www.half-fast.com/Takumar-200/ As you can see, I'm no Doug Herr or Bob Palmieri. ;-) The first picture was an attempt to show the bokeh, the buildings were about 1/4 mile away from me. It's a nice lens and it doesn't show any chromatic aberration but "it ain't no floater". Jim Jim Nichols wrote: > Jim, > > Mine is a Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 200mm f/4 which has six blades. I > purchased it used, so I have no idea of its place in the Takumar > lineup. I used it to reach out to some airplanes that were behind the > ropes at a local airshow, because they were taking part in the flying > display, and it delivered sharp images. I have not used it a lot, but > it seems to be a better short tele than the 135mm I previously used. > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA