Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Wait - Aren't David and Peter twins? On 8/7/06 1:25 PM, "Walt Johnson" <walt@waltjohnson.com> wrote: > I was trying to remember who the fellow was? His brother? > > Walt > > Craig Semetko wrote: > >> Hey Walt, >> >> I may be wrong, but I don't think David Turnley missed the shot--he >> was 16 in 1972 when the shot was taken... >> >> Cheers, >> >> Craig >> >> NO ARCHIVE >> >> On Aug 7, 2006, at 9:05 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: >> >>> From: Walt Johnson <walt@waltjohnson.com> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Another Altered Photo >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >>> Message-ID: <44D7587C.5040607@waltjohnson.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>> >>> I'm sure those in the unaltered photo were much happier being bombed in >>> low contrast. As I mentioned before, look at Christopher Anderson's work >>> http://www.magnumphotos.com/c/ on the Magnum site. Anderson, a Canadian, >>> should be relatively objective. His work seems to be straightforward and >>> for him, a very risky business. Wonder what rationale Limbaugh would use >>> prove Anderson's images fake? Perhaps he could call on Westmoreland's PR >>> expert who stated Nick Ut faked it with his napalm shot. I've heard >>> tales David Turnley missed the shot loading an M3 but that Ut was also >>> using a Leica? >>> >>> Walt >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information