Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] basic older M lens question
From: msmall at infionline.net (Marc James Small)
Date: Fri Jul 28 17:38:32 2006

At 01:53 PM 7/28/06 +1000, G Hopkinson wrote:
>Folks, pardon the basic question.
>
>I'm looking at getting an inexpensive 135mm for occasional use on my M6 .85.
>
>I've read a little but am still unsure on some mechanics regarding which
>ones have the detachable mount or require the viso? system.
>
>Herr Putt's review of the f4 Elmar 135 has nary a word on any adaptor
>requirement.
>
>The lens I have inquired about is currently in our FS from a member in
>Singapore.
>
>It's listed as M mount. I have no idea as yet regarding whether it works
>normally on my M or requires the adaptor system.

Hoppy

This lens will mount directly to any M camera and will do you proud --
Hell, I own one and love it for its magnificent performatnce.  An ADDED
benefit with this lens, which you can ignore if you wish, is that the
lens-head can be unscrewed and then used in turn with an adaptor to fit
itself to VISO use.

I regard a 135 as the perfect lens for a Leica M but, then, I hate
wide-angles used thoughtlessly, as would seem to be the case.

(Calm down, guys:  that is just an expression of opinion that I have given
here since 1994 or whenver, and not an invitation for a flame war. I know
what Capa said, and I disagree, and so be it.)

Marc

msmall@aya.yale.edu 
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!




Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] basic older M lens question)
Reply from lew1716 at optonline.net (Lew) ([Leica] FX15/AcutolS Dev times)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] basic older M lens question)