Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]ALL my B&W postings from the last 3-4 weeks are with 777. I threw things at it and it just plain works. I am getting much better negs than Xtol, DD-X etc. I am definitely staying with 777. Indoor, outdoor, high sun, contrasty stagelight, the tonal range just goes on and on. It definitely does not inspire confidence to look at though. Polluted lake water looks more like a developer than this. At 07:08 PM 7/25/2006, Jeffery Smith wrote: >I've pretty much settled on two developers in my future, and they are the >decided underdogs of 777 and PMK Pyro. How did these two developers fall out >of favor? Well, whatever the case, I'm doing more film + developer testing >than real shooting, but I think my testing phases are behind me. These are >the last 2 weeks' PAWs. > >TRI-X and 777 >http://www.400tx.com/2006-29.html > >Neopan 400 and PMK Pyro >http://www.400tx.com/2006-30.html > >I am hoping to see some more 777 results from Richard and Feli. The 777 is >particularly a panacea for those of us in hot climates. > // richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please use richard at imagecraft.com)