Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Fuji GW690III VS Pan II opinions
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sat Jul 15 05:41:08 2006
References: <9b678e0607150533r35ce0a9di9ffa44ddc40d08e9@mail.gmail.com> <20060715123740.KVPF27612.tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net@vickko1>

Vick,
They are great picture takers withing their limitations.  If the ergonomics
work for you then you will be a very happy camper.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 7/15/06, Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> Thanks Don
>
> I'm looking at one to try the 6x9 negative.  I've got a Bessa II already
> for
> 6x9, but wanted to give the Fuji a go.
>
> regards
> Vick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+vick.ko=sympatico.ca@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Don
> Dory
> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 8:34 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Fuji GW690III VS Pan II opinions
>
> Bill,
> The Fuji's are a medium format camera in either a 6X9 or a 6X7 format so
> not
> really an XPan competitor per se.  Durability wise they have held up very
> well, the rangefinder seems very robust and the leaf shutters seem to
> always
> fire.  Lens wise, Fuji makes a very competitive lens and with a 6X9 image
> that is plenty good.
>
> Some carp about the polycarbonate construction but carp even more about
> the
> weight of the older all brass G690.  If you want or need a largish image
> and
> a fixed 65mm or 90mm will do the job these are relatively inexpensive high
> quality tools.
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
>
> On 7/15/06, Bill Smith <wrs111445@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Are the Fuji GW / GSWs just less expensive alternatives to the 'Blad
> > Pan II or they equals in durability/ pic quality?
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> >
> > Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote:
> > Yes. The GW models have a fixed 3.5/90mm, the GSW models a 5.6/65mm. I
> > belive W means Wide and SW SuperWide. For the G690/G690BL there were
> > several exchangeable wide angle lenses, the 5.6/50mm, 5.6/65mm,
> > 8.0/65mm, even the 3.5/100mm is a wide. Calculate 42% for the 35mm
> equivalent focal length.
> > Didier
> >
> >
> >
> > >Was there one with a wider lens?
> > >Eric
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Re: Fuji GW690III VS Pan II opinions)
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re: Fuji GW690III VS Pan II opinions)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Re: Fuji GW690III VS Pan II opinions)