Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Good! Flonase works for me, like in the fall, but you have to take it every day (twice I think) for it to have its full effect. I just don't like to take it all the time. Robert Johnson ------------------------------------------- lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: >Send LUG mailing list submissions to > lug@leica-users.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > lug-request@leica-users.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > lug-owner@leica-users.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of LUG digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: WTB: Fuji GW690III Texas Leica? (vick.ko@sympatico.ca) > 2. M7 and Film! (Tina Manley) > 3. Re: opinions of the Ricoh GRD--why not Canon S-80 (Nathan Wajsman) > 4. Re: Re: WTB: Fuji GW690III Texas Leica? (Eric Korenman) > 5. Re: opinions of the Ricoh GRD--why not Canon S-80 > (Philippe Orlent) > 6. Re: opinions of the Ricoh GRD--why not Canon S-80 (Rei Shinozuka) > 7. RE: FS: Leica CL (Joe Leung) > 8. Re: opinions of the Ricoh GRD--why not Canon S-80 > (Philippe Orlent) > 9. Film Forevah!! (Richard) > 10. Re: opinions of the Ricoh GRD--why not Canon S-80 (Didier Ludwig) > 11. Re: Re: WTB: Fuji GW690III Texas Leica? (Didier Ludwig) > 12. M7 and B&W! (Tina Manley) > 13. Re: M7 and B&W! (Robert Meier) > 14. Re: M7 and B&W! (mehrdad) > 15. Re: Photographer Suggestions # 3 (Peter Dzwig) > 16. Re: M7 and B&W! (Richard) > 17. Re: fascinated by the flickr site (Tina Manley) > 18. RE: M7 and B&W! (Frank Filippone) > 19. Photo: Woof woof! (Richard) > 20. Re: opinions of the Ricoh GRD--why not Canon S-80 > (Philippe Orlent) > 21. Re: fascinated by the flickr site (Philippe Orlent) > 22. Re: M7 and B&W! (R. Clayton McKee) > 23. Re: M7 and Film! (R. Clayton McKee) > 24. Re: caution kid pics (Don Dory) > 25. Re: They shoot movies, don't they? (Don Dory) > 26. Re: They shoot movies, don't they? (Don Dory) > 27. Re: M7 and B&W! (Peter Dzwig) > 28. Re: They shoot movies, don't they? (SonC@aol.com) > 29. Re: Lily in Black and White (Eric) > 30. Re: M7 and B&W! (Tina Manley) > 31. Re: PAW 27 - Cote D Azur (Jim Hemenway) > 32. Re: The Last Words on B&W Scanning (Jim Hemenway) > 33. Re: M7 and Film! (Ric Carter) > 34. Re: M7 and B&W! (Kenneth Frazier) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:16:45 -0400 >From: <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> >Subject: [Leica] Re: WTB: Fuji GW690III Texas Leica? >To: <vick.ko@sympatico.ca>, Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>, > Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >Message-ID: > > <20060714211645.CEDX16051.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@smtp1.sympatico.ca> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > >Thanks for all the replies so far. > >I'm looking for the GW, which has the 90mm lens. > >To the person who saw the "ugly" one at KEH, how ugly was the glass? > >regards >Vick > > > >>From: <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> >>Date: 2006/07/14 Fri PM 04:22:07 EST >>To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>, Leica Users Group >><lug@leica-users.org> >>Subject: WTB: Fuji GW690III Texas Leica? >> >>WTB: Fuji GW690III Texas Leica ? >> >>regards >>Vick >> >> >> > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:35:05 -0400 >From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> >Subject: [Leica] M7 and Film! >To: leica@freelists.org, Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>, > MUGers@yahoogroups.com, paw@micapeak.com, seephoto@micapeak.com >Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060714171935.0533ed68@infoave.net> >Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii > >PESO: > >For those who prefer film, I'm going back through some files to print >photos to take to Honduras next week. Here's the same home with the >M7 and 24 on one and Noctilux on the other. This is in a very remote >Lenca Indian community in the mountains that is accessible only by >horse or foot. I rode a horse named Jumper and regretted it. I >should have walked. At least my sturdy Leica lenses and cameras >survived being bounced against each other and my bones for many, many >miles!! Jumper jumped down a very steep slope across a stream and up >rocks on the other side, slipping and sliding all the way. I stayed >on! Coming back three days later, I walked down the rocks, across >the stream, back up the hill and got back on Jumper on the other side. > >Your comments are welcome! > >http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/63493359 >http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/63493639 > >Thanks! > >Tina > >Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA >http://www.tinamanley.com > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:40:38 +0200 >From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan@nathanfoto.com> >Subject: Re: [Leica] opinions of the Ricoh GRD--why not Canon S-80 >To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> >Message-ID: <44B80F56.3010004@nathanfoto.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >Yes, I usually have it turned off and use the CV finder only. I only >turn it on when I need to change something in the menu. The added >advantage of this is that the battery lasts a long time for a small unit >like this. > >Nathan > >SonC@aol.com wrote: > > >> >> >>In a message dated 7/14/2006 12:37:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time, >>nathan@nathanfoto.com writes: >> >> >>In summary: I am happy with the GRD, but it is not as superior to >>other compacts as the spec sheet would have you believe. >> >> >>Can you turn off the display? >> >> >>Regards, >>Sonny >>http://www.sonc.com >>Natchitoches, Louisiana >>Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane >>?galit?, libert?, crawfish >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Leica Users Group. >>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> >> > > >