Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/07/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: NYT photo editor
From: neilsimages at pipeline.com (Neil Schneider)
Date: Wed Jul 12 07:55:07 2006
References: <200607110242.k6B2gGGn040386@server1.waverley.reid.org> <ef885258bcab9a4d95ff6b5af3fa609d@optonline.net> <001d01c6a4fd$cf8440b0$a302a8c0@ted> <D5A19F3D366D771D9EF2918F@hindolveston.reid.org> <000501c6a50d$a4c80e50$a302a8c0@ted> <6.2.5.6.2.20060712094046.02fad508@screengang.com> <001f01c6a5c0$11ac82a0$a302a8c0@ted>

On Jul 12, 2006, at 16:32, Ted Grant wrote:

> Didier,
> No question, the internet has and is making a major mark in the 
> publishing business, newspapers, books, magazines and almost every 
> other form of printed matter.
>
> I suppose the only money making way they can keep profitable is charge 
> a fee to enter the site as we see with some newspapers today.
>
> Not long ago I read an article pointing out many of the sites we 
> receive at no cost will gradually become "pay for sites" simply 
> because companies will eventually have to receive some form of 
> financial compenstion rather than giving it away. Why?
>
> Well someone has to be paid to enter the information to the site and 
> most corporations are not benevolent societies. Like you, before my 
> morning paper arrives at 5.30 a.m., I've already read most of the 
> major stories off the internet.
>
> So it's almost asking... "Why bother paying for a subscription when I 
> can read it for free on the screen before the paper arrives?" That 
> eventually leads to, cancel subscription! And if this occurs in large 
> numbers somebody is going to be paying for what we read on screen 
> sooner or later. Or the newspaper goes belly-up. Maybe?
>
> ted


Ted,
I believe that newspapers will flourish online without charging a 
subscription price once they learn how google and yahoo make billions 
from advertising. As the readership transfers from newsprint to online 
in higher numbers, the advertisers will realize that  that is where 
their market is and can then zero in on specific targets for their 
products. It may take some rethinking on advertisers but they will 
eventually get it.....

Neil


Replies: Reply from telyt at telus.net (David Young) ([Leica] Re: NYT photo editor)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: NYT photo editor)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re: NYT photo editor)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Re: NYT photo editor)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re: NYT photo editor)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Re: NYT photo editor)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Re: NYT photo editor)